Serverless vs Traditional Backend The decision between a serverless and a traditional backend might affect development time, scalability, and cost. Let's investigate the best times for each.



Serverless is Best When:

  • You have intermittent workloads (sporadic traffic).

  • You want rapid development and less infrastructure management.

  • You need automatic scaling for unpredictable traffic.

  • Examples: image processing, scheduled tasks, webhook handlers.

Traditional Backend is Best When:

  • Long-running processes are required.

  • You need full control over infrastructure and servers.

  • Low latency is critical for all requests.

  • Examples: gaming servers, high-performance APIs, real-time data pipelines.

Comparison Table:

Feature Serverless Traditional Backend
Infrastructure Managed by cloud Managed by you
Scaling Automatic Manual/Configured
Pricing Pay-per-use Fixed
Startup Time Very fast Can be slow
Best Use Case Event-driven tasks Continuous services

Conclusion

For workloads that are flexible and event-driven, serverless is ideal. Long-running or high-performance scenarios are ideal for traditional backends. The decision is based on the requirements of your project.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog